Alabama Senate Committee Approves Gambling Expansion

Del Marsh believes gambling revenues are the way that is best to balance Alabama’s budget.

An Alabama casino gambling bill narrowly passed through committee week that is last giving the legislation the opportunity to be heard by the full State Senate.

The bill, known as SB 453, passed through the Tourism and Marketing Committee by a five to three vote on Thursday.

The bill is designed to assist produce new revenue for the state in two ways.

First, it could develop a continuing state lottery that might be regulated by an Alabama Lottery and Gaming Commission.

Bill Will Allow for Four Gambling Enterprises

Perhaps more dramatically, that commission would also be charged with overseeing the introduction of casino gambling in the state.

Such operations would be allowed at four horse racing tracks through the entire state, the very first time casino games like slots, blackjack, as well as other dining table games is allowed into the state.

The bill, which would amend hawaii constitution, ended up being introduced earlier this month by Senate President Del Marsh (R-Anniston). He said that with the state needing an influx of revenue, he would rather see that money come through legalized gambling than using a taxation increase.

‘This is a big bit of legislation, a very controversial piece,’ Marsh said at a public hearing regarding the bill held Tuesday. ‘But I think it’s an option that will be put here as an alternative to aid try to fix some associated with spending plan problems in this state.’

Many Miss Electronic Bingo Casinos

During those hearings, there was impassioned testimony from all edges associated with problem. Many people spoke of attempting to see the return of video gaming to facilities that once had it, before alleged electronic bingo casinos were closed down in the state following an Alabama Supreme Court ruling last year.

‘I’ve seen good hardworking people doing without, getting close to hungry,’ stated Macon County equipment shop owner Brent Thomas, who said that his area was indeed hurt tremendously by the closure of this VictoryLand bingo casino.

Meanwhile, others argued against any gaming expansion, saying that most of the cash that the state made from the games would be coming from the indegent.

‘It is really a income tax,’ said Joe Godfrey, executive director regarding the Alabama Citizens Action Project. ‘It’s a tax in the poor. It preys on the people who can least afford to pay it.’

Native American Casinos Active in State

Still others remarked that there had been gaming in the state, as the Poarch Band of Creek Indians currently operate three casinos with electronic bingo machines in Alabama.

That, Marsh said, intended the option wasn’t between having gambling or not, but instead whether the state would collect income from the gambling that was occurring.

As for the Poarch Band, they say that the new bill doesn’t contain enough rules about precisely what would be allowed during the race songs where gambling would be allowed, that could leave loopholes that operators will attempt to exploit.

‘It’s like handing your teenager a credit card without any rules connected and then being astonished when a bill is got by you that seems like the Alabama budget deficit,’ said Robert McGhee, treasurer of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Council. ‘It’s a backwards thinking that opens the door to practices that are potentially irresponsible will be hard to rein in following the fact.’

The bill would enable for casino gambling at competition songs in Birmingham, Macon, mobile phone and Greene County. Proponents say that gambling expansion could create over $400 million in new income and 11,000 jobs for their state.

So as to approve a noticeable modification to their state constitution to permit for gambling, three-fifths of the legislature will have to straight back the bill, as would a majority of voters in a state referendum.

New Form Of Connecticut Casino Bill To See Voting This Week

The Mohegan Sun is one of two casinos in Connecticut wary of the latest competition from Massachusetts and New York. (Image:

Connecticut desperately wants to find an option to fight straight back against the casino that is coming in Massachusetts and New York.

This week, it appears as although the state Senate will give consideration to a bill that would do exactly that.

A fresh version of a Connecticut casino bill is slated to be voted on by hawaii’s Senate, and will allow the state’s two casino operating Indian tribes to build a resort that is new go along with the two they already run.

The bill seems to be much faster than in earlier variations: rather than a bill that is 16-page was previously under consideration, The Hartford Courant says that a working draft of the brand new legislation is 75 pages long, or about three pages.

First Variation Allowed for Three Casinos

In previous versions of proposed casino legislation, Connecticut might have allowed for up to three casinos that are new be operated by the Mashantucket Pequot and Mohegan tribes, which run Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun, respectively. In the newest version, only one extra casino would be permitted.

That casino that is new potentially be built any place in the state, and the bill outlines a process that would allow the two tribes to talk to towns enthusiastic about making proposals to host the facility.

However, it might likely be located somewhere within the I-91 corridor north of Hartford, where it may potentially restrict the loss in gambling revenue that could be due to the MGM that is upcoming Springfield Massachusetts.

There have already been several towns in that area that have expressed an interest in attracting a casino. Possible suitors could include East Windsor and East Hartford, among others.

Massachusetts Casinos Could Eat Into Revenue

Both Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods are gravely concerned about the potential effect regarding the Massachusetts casinos, which in turn concerns lawmakers, as the state shares in the slot machine game revenue at both resorts.

The state made as much as $430 million from that compact in 2007; that number fell to just under $280 million in 2014, and some projections have that total falling to as low as $189 million in 2018 at one point.

Under the brand new version of the bill, final authorization for a new casino would occur until 2016, as the typical Assembly will have to accept any deal that has been made between the tribes and a town or city.

‘It became clear it had to be more of a process that is two-step’ Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff (D-Norwalk) told the Connecticut Mirror. ‘It couldn’t be performed in a single bill.’

Tribal leaders appears pleased with all the new bill, also they may have hoped for if it doesn’t provide the immediate impact.

‘ Our goal from the outset has been to protect the 9,300 jobs and revenue that will be lost to competition on Connecticut’s borders, and this bill is believed by us, if approved, will supply the Mohegan and Mashantucket Pequot Tribes the ability to begin to take action to do so,’ said Patty McQueen, a spokesperson for the two tribes.

However, it’s additionally possible that there could be numerous questions that are legal hang over the legislation, a prospect that Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen raised earlier this 12 months. The bill even generally seems to anticipate the risk of legal challenges, stating in one area that if a court ‘holds any provision with this section unconstitutional, the remaining provisions of the area shall be inoperative and possess no effect.’

Deutsche Bank Report States New Jersey Should Open Casinos Beyond Atlantic City

The Meadowlands might be home up to a casino if nj enables gambling outside of Atlantic City. (Image: John Munson/The Star-Ledger)

New Jersey has toyed with the thought of opening a casino within the northern part regarding the state, a move that could mark the time that is first in hawaii had spread beyond Atlantic City.

That effort might get more help carrying out a report by Deutsche Bank that says this kind of casino could be just what nj-new Jersey needs.

Deutsche Bank analyst Andrew Zarnett filed a report last week that took an overall look at the New Jersey gaming industry, and found it will be within the state’s most readily useful interest to build at least one casino in northern New Jersey, perhaps at the Meadowlands.

‘We believe that one or two casinos in north Jersey could generate well over $500 million, putting ~$275 million into their state’s coffers and thus is a smart move for the state,’ Zarnett wrote. ‘It’s good from a budgetary position and also for Atlantic City, as long as some of those tax revenues go back once again to that market.’

Talk of New Casino Intensifies

The topic of placing a casino at the Meadowlands or elsewhere in northern New Jersey heated up year that is last as some lawmakers seemed forward to possibly broaching the problem at the conclusion of 2015 or in 2016.

In February 2011, Governor Chris Christie place an unofficial five-year hang on such talks in order to provide the city’s gaming industry time to enhance minus the pressure of some other local casino potentially cannibalizing the market.

In specific, Senate President Stephen Sweeney (D-Gloucester) said last year that it might be possible to carry a statewide referendum on building new casinos elsewhere in their state in November 2015. Zarnett spoke to this possibility in his report.

‘It is our belief that the ballot question to allow video gaming outside of Atlantic City could come this 15,’ he wrote november.

Voter Turnout Concerns

However, supporters of such a move might not be trying to hold the vote so soon. Based on Sweeney, the expected lower voter turnout in a year that is off elections could harm the measure, as voters from Atlantic City and nearby areas may be more motivated to emerge and vote against it than voters from the north part of the state are to support it.

That could mean holding the vote off until November 2016, when an election that is presidential guarantee a top percentage of New Jersey adults head towards the polls. But others who are in support of the casino expansion nevertheless want to view a vote this season.

‘ We now have to do it now, so we don’t fall even further and further behind other states,’ said State Senator Ray Lesniak (D-Union County). ‘Atlantic City will continue to decline, and racing shall continue to decrease. This may perfectly be our chance that is last.

Deutsche Bank Expects More Closures

The Deutsche Bank report additionally painted an outlook that is grim Atlantic City’s casinos, projecting that gaming revenues into the city would fall to about $1.8 billion in 2017 due to increased gaming choices in surrounding states. Which could mean further casino closures in the years to come.

‘ We might expect Taj Mahal and a Boardwalk that is second casino join the list of shuttered properties in the outer years,’ Zarnett penned.

The report’s conclusion is straightforward, and the one that supporters of a north Jersey casino will be happy to quote.

‘In summation, it’s time for New Jersey to push forward with plans for a North Jersey casino or casinos,’ Zarnett had written. ‘And as a result, we believe that the step that is next a constitutional referendum this November providing approval for gaming outside of Atlantic City.’

View All Insight Posts