Oakland Raiders Get New Stadium Proposal in Bay Area

The Oakland Raiders are set to pack their bags for Las Vegas, but one private investment firm is hoping to persuade the storied franchise to stay put in California.

Mark Davis wants to move his Oakland Raiders to Las Vegas, but investors in the Bay Area are hoping he reconsiders.

Fortress Investment Group, a publicly traded investment management firm based in New York City, is working with former NFL celebrity and Hall of Fame user Ronnie Lott to preserve the Raiders in the Bay Area. This week, the company resubmitted plans to a build a new 55,000-seat arena to keep owner Mark Davis in town.

The proposal is rumored to price $1.3 billion, and will also be funded through Fortress putting up $600 million, the NFL and Raiders investing $500 million, and the City of Oakland funding $200 million. The football that is pro confirmed to news outlets that it had received the submission.

The group that is same presented a similar proposition, but the NFL rejected it on grounds that more information ended up being required.

Las Vegas Calls Bluff

While there are lots of Las Vegas locals who are not as much as enthused about the possibility of a NFL team calling the town home, the neighborhood government mostly generally seems to support the Oakland Raiders coming to the Mojave Desert.

Nevada has committed $750 million to building a 65,000-seat stadium that is domed steps from the Strip. The money shall have raising the hotel occupancy tax in Clark County.

Davis prefers the $1.9 billion Vegas deal over residing in Oakland, and Sin City lawmakers are not appearing concerned that the group owner is utilizing the Bay Area as leverage.

‘I am in regular contact aided by the Raiders. I do not think that staying in Oakland is definitely an option for them,’ Clark County Commission Chairman Steve Sisolak told the Las Las Vegas Review-Journal.

Once looking like very nearly a thing that is sure Davis’ go on to Nevada suffered a severe blow whenever Las Vegas Sands billionaire Sheldon Adelson withdrew his $650 million pledge to your arena in late January. The casino magnate became furious because of the Raiders after he felt the team went behind his back in presenting a lease agreement to the city that has beenn’t contingent on Adelson’s participation.

Vegas or Bust

All public evidence and statements from the owner pinpoint Vegas as the preferred home despite rumors that Davis might be considering staying in Oakland. Two banks that are unnamed since stepped up to cover the $650 million gap left by Adelson’s departure.

The step that is next the Las Vegas Raiders coming to fruition is for Davis to formalize a lease agreement with the city and come to monetary terms on the arrangement. He previously recommended that the group pay $1 an in rent year.

Davis will meet the vegas Stadium Authority on March 9 to discuss the contract. When finalized, he can then make their instance to the NFL’s 31 other owners later this thirty days throughout a meeting in Phoenix.

Should three-fourths of the ownership help Davis’ moving, the team would be cleared for Las Vegas.

Seminole Tribe Rejects Both Florida Gambling Bills

Florida’s Seminole Tribe may have just branched out into Atlantic City with all the purchase of the Taj, but, closer to home, their relationship with hawaii of Florida remains complicated.

Marcellus Osceola, Seminole Tribal Council chairman, said that neither of two bills in the Florida legislature would solve compact negotiations because neither of the make any financial sense for the tribe. (Image: Seminole Tribe of Florida)

Two competing bills into the Florida legislature each seek to find different answers to the very fact that tribe and state have now been unable to negotiate a new compact since the previous one expired in 2015.

The Seminoles this week rejected both, even the one which’s supposedly designed to protect their interests.

A bill currently wending its means through the House would allow the Seminoles to be granted exclusivity on banked card games, as was the case with its compact that is previous in exchange for $3 billion in payments to the state over seven years.

The same fee over the same timeline but for the right to offer craps and roulette, as well as blackjack by contrast, a bill authored by the influential senator, Bill Galvano, would charge the seminoles.

Meanwhile, the right to offer blackjack would expand to parimutuel venues. Galvano’s bill would also, among other things, authorize slot machines in eight counties South that is outside Florida.

Bargaining Energy

In a letter to legislative leaders this week, Seminole Tribal Council president Marcellus Osceola said that while the House bill ended up being ‘less objectionable,’ neither bills ‘make economic sense for the tribe.’

We think they are dealing with the ‘$3 billion to their state’ bit.

The House bill is less objectionable because it really is essentially a status quo bill, an antidote to the rampant gambling expansion of Galvano’s proposition.

It is clear that, for the Seminoles, the thought of exclusivity on craps and roulette would not offset the increased competition from the proliferation of blackjack and slots throughout the state.

The tribe’s point-blank refusal is indicative of the its new-found leverage in the negotiations, thanks to a recent court ruling within their benefit.

$3 Billion Missed Opportunity

In December, a federal judge ruled that the Seminoles could continue to provide blackjack at their properties until 2030 since the state had violated the previous compact by allowing cardrooms and racetracks to provide banked card games and electronic blackjack at their premises.

Their state gambling regulator made a serious error of judgement in approving those games and also the ruling deals the Seminoles a massive hand as the negotiations continue.

The Seminoles really agreed the terms regarding the compact lay out inside your home bill this past year, in a deal negotiated with Governor Rick Scott, but the legislature did not pass it. It would have been the casino revenue-sharing deal that is biggest in the US.

But why would the Seminoles, who, incidentally, continue to be making large payments to their state purely out of goodwill, agree to $3 billion over seven years now if they’re allowed to offer blackjack until 2030 anyway? The legislature had its opportunity but it well and truly missed the boat.

North Dakota Casino Bill Would Spend State in Commercial Gambling

A North Dakota casino proposal would put the state into the business of commercial gambling should it become law.

The Standing Rock protests are most likely going to be rendered unsuccessful after President Trump ordered the pipeline task can move ahead. Native Us citizens in the continuing state might be waiting for you for another round of bad news if voters approve a North Dakota casino bill. (Image: Helen Richardson/Denver Post)

Introduced by House Majority Leader Al Carlson (R-Fargo), Concurrent Resolution 3033 calls for the construction of six casinos that are state-owned top of the Midwestern jurisdiction. The Republican is hoping to put a ballot question before voters through the 2018 primary election.

‘Voters have actually shown us that they’re much more open-minded after they passed the medical marijuana bill,’ Carlson told the Forum Information Service, a wire media outlet that covers the Dakotas. ‘It’s a revenue booster.’

Gambling in North Dakota happens to be restricted to tribal gambling enterprises, but blackjack, pull-tabs, and bingo are widespread in bars and taverns under charitable video gaming law.

Should voters embrace the thought of their state investing within the gambling company, Carlson’s measure would call for the resorts to become destination-oriented facilities that appeal to a far reaching demographic. The bill would create a casino also gaming commission.

Disruptive Law

Opponents to Carlson’s North Dakota casino bill say it would negatively influence tribal groups, and potentially lead to smaller tax proceeds stemming from charitable gaming and the lottery.

Between 2013 and 2015, more than $43 million had been generated for charitable uses from non-tribal gambling, and the state’s general fund obtained $6.8 million.

North Dakota additionally collects on Indian casinos through its compact utilizing the brick-and-mortar resorts. Tribal groups pay between five and 5.5 percent of these net win on Class III games (casino-style video gaming that includes slots and table games) to Bismarck.

Under the congressional Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, federally recognized tribes are allowed to supply course I and II games on their sovereign lands. But to add table games, and the slot that is all-important, a compact must be reached with individual states.

Carlson’s bill would mandate that the state-owned casinos be at least 20 miles from a reservation that is indian and can’t be located within a community that’s population exceeds 5,000.

Between Rock and a Pipeline

Carlson’s casino expansion push truly doesn’t come at a perfect time for tribal teams. The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe is currently in the midst of a highly publicized battle that is legal federal authorities over the Dakota Access Pipeline, a thing that President Donald Trump has authorized to go forward.

Protestors have flooded the area to help the tribe protect its land, but Trump’s orders give authorities the directly to continue construction. The situation has cost the tribe dearly. The Sioux people say its Prairie Knights Casino & Resort has taken a $6 million hit, as visitors have remained away as a result of the ongoing conflict.

Roads have now been closed by protestors and agitators, and also the contentious region has forced many would-be patrons to other video gaming establishments in North Dakota.

‘There’s absolutely no doubt that the protests . . . have had a significant effect on people’s cap ability to access the casino and simply their comfort level driving down,’ tribal interaction spokesman LaRoy Kingsley told The Washington circumstances last month.

Sands Bethlehem Reportedly on Sheldon Adelson’s Chopping Block

Sands Bethlehem, probably the most lucrative casino in Pennsylvania, is apparently being pursued by an buyer that is unidentified. The resort is owned by billionaire Sheldon Adelson’s Las Vegas Sands empire, and is the business’s only non-Las Las Vegas domestic home.

Billionaire Sheldon Adelson is reportedly in speaks to sell Sands Bethlehem, a casino resort situated in eastern Pennsylvania. (Image: Ethan Miller/Getty Images)

Sands Bethlehem CEO Mark Juliano informed employees through an email this that a sale was possible week.

Ron Reese, Sands’ VP of federal government relations and community development, said in a statement, ‘Las Vegas Sands is regularly approached about potential curiosity about various assets. The company has no announcement to make at this right time.’

Of Pennsylvania’s 12 land-based casinos, Sands Bethlehem pulls in the cash that is most. The resort obtained $305.3 million in gross slot terminal income over the past year that is fiscal and $228.1 million in gross revenue stemming from table games.

Exposed during 2009, Las Vegas Sands has spent $800 million in the hotel and casino. But utilizing the continuing state mulling gaming expansion, like the possibility for legalizing internet casinos, Adelson is rumored become done with the Keystone State.

Agitated Adelson

Worth more than $30 billion, Adelson is familiar with getting what he wishes. That’s why some think he is furious that Pennsylvania lawmakers are pushing to authorize online gambling.

The vegas tycoon is really a staunch opponent to gambling online. He’s funding congressional efforts to pass the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA), a bill that could essentially make internet gambling a beef that is federal and is behind the Coalition to end online Gambling (CSIG).

An advocate for internet gambling who has since retired in 2015, the group produced a video that targeted then-State Rep. John Payne. In the 30-second spot, the CSIG said Payne was ‘working hard to legalize predatory online gambling’ and ‘putting families at risk.’

Juliano denounced internet gambling summer that is last legislation had been first considered in Pennsylvania. ‘we have an investment that is big. I actually don’t know where they think all these new customers are originating from,’ the professional said in July.

The state is mulling whether to allow airports to house slot machines, another ominous concern to land-based casino operators in addition to online free cleopatra slot machine 100 gambling. Safety workers also unionized recently at Sands Bethlehem, and Adelson despises labor unions.

Money Matters Most

While the stoppage of online gambling is crucial that you Adelson, Pennsylvania considering iCasinos isn’t most likely at fault for the potential sale of this Sands property. Instead, it’s more probable that the state’s recent tax hike on gambling is always to blame.

The legislature recently increased table game fees from 14 to 16 percent. That calculates into Sands having to pay about $4.6 million more to their state every year.

Juliano states Pennsylvania is already one of the highest tariffed gambling jurisdictions in America. But irrespective, Sands Bethlehem announced fall that is last it ended up being going forward with a $90 million expansion project.

The casino is within the procedure for enlarging its floor to accommodate 1,000 brand new seats, and is making area for additional restaurants and better back-of-house facilities. The project had been confirmed just after the brand New Jersey ballot question presented to voters to end Atlantic City’s monopoly in the Garden State was rejected. 

View All Insight Posts