Twas the Night of the Living Dead: Zombie Apocalypse Is a Good Bet

Day might the Zombie Apocalypse arrive on Xmas? You can bet on it! (Image:

Every year punters spot bets on whether or not they will get up up to a snowy blanket across their roads on Christmas morning. It is the old romantic in each of us that longs for this backdrop that is scenic a joyous day, surrounded by our liked ones and overeating with the Christmas trimmings, cannibalizing and spreading our infectious zombie disease. Wait. What?

Betting on Zombies

While many are wagering for a white xmas, UK bookmaking giant Ladbrokes is offering chances of 2000/1 on this xmas being the beginning of the Zombie Apocalypse. That is a good, festive thought to possess, and beats the chances they offer for football team Crystal Palace winning the Premier League in 2010 at 5000/1. Mention harmful gambling.

‘we are quite confident that the odds of a Zombie Apocalypse at 2000/1 are correct, and although the public should exert caution over the Christmas period, they ought not to be unduly concerned about the undead rising up to attack and consume the living,’ announced Alex Donohue, a spokesman for the Ladbrokes bookmaker.

Chances on a Christmas that is white currently at 5/1, which is a much better chance compared to those offered on the doomsday coming associated with undead, and you are more likely in order to claim your winnings after a little bit of snow rather than being forced to fight your way through the zombie hordes to collect your award. Although you will be pretty smug with yourself if you got that bet right, that’s for certain.

While the possibility to bet on the Zombie Apocalypse is significantly more than likely a bit that is nice of for Ladbrokes, Sean Page zombie specialist and founder associated with Ministry of Zombies has urged the public to organize for the worst.

‘The public is often interested in the chances of the white Christmas, nevertheless they must certanly be more concerned by the increasing likelihood of a Zombie Apocalypse,’ stated Page, suggesting, maybe, that he is nipping during the whiskey by having a bit excessively alacrity.

‘The most time that is likely an outbreak is through the busy yuletide season as people save money amount of time in large groups, rendering it easier for the zombie virus to spread, triggering the Apocalypse,’ Page included. Apparently, he’s seen it happen before.

Bets That Are Dead On

2000/1 seems too low for the likelihood of a zombie epidemic really, but this isn’t the first time Ladbrokes has offered the possiblity to place wagers on the Apocalypse, while they additionally offered the exact same odds in the outbreak of a undead siege on December 21st 2012, owing to all of the hype around the end of the Mayan calendar to which doomsday ‘enthusiasts’ were clinging hopefully in anticipation of their impending doom.

Strangely enough, Ladbrokes are also providing much more likely odds of 500/1 on the risk of Prince Harry getting hitched to Miley Cyrus, but the smart profit this case would most likely be on the zombies, even though that you would be unlikely to recoup any bet due to the, you realize, end of the planet and all that. So less ‘nothing was stirring’ and more ‘watch out for the bloodthirsty, flesh-eating undead outside of the hinged door.’

MGM Clears Hurdles in Massachusetts; Gaming Commission Nevertheless Must Okay

MGM Resorts is almost through the gauntlet that is regulatory Massachusetts for their Springfield casino project (Image: Artist’s rendering of casino)

Simply once you thought no one would ever be good enough for Massachusetts’ insanely gaming that is fastidious, the MGM actually earned their approbation this week. The commission’s investigative arm which may have its TV that is own series ‘MGC P.I.’ suggested that MGM Resorts be found suitable to move ahead with their Springfield casino project, with the caveat that MGM executives be able to talk their way out of a few lingering issues associated with commission, concerns that came to light once the commission conducted its regulatory background check in the casino company.

Cleared for Lose

When we say ‘lengthy’, we aren’t whistling Dixie; the Bureau of Investigations and Enforcement spent yesteryear 10 months looking through every speck of dirt that anyone associated with MGM ever came across, and amazingly noted that they found nothing that would automatically disqualify the group from setting up household within the pristine state of Massachusetts.

But it is not really a done deal yet; the five Massachusetts Gaming Commissioners still get to have the last word on whether or not MGM are in a position to do business within their neck of the forests. But if they give their papal blessing to the company, MGM will then manage to submit their last application as the one and only western Massachusetts casino license that will likely be given out; and since they’re truly the only remaining applicant, that would seem to be a pretty complete deal.

The only tiny ding that the Bureau could discover after almost a 12 months of searching all documented in a 500-page report on the topic was MGM’s method of dealing former executive board member Terry Christensen, whom in 2008 was convicted on charges relating to the wiretapping of business mogul Kirk Kerkorian’s ex-wife when Kerkorian had been involved in a gruesome child support fight.

‘Despite their indictment, resignation from the Board and conviction that is ultimate Christensen was permitted to activate, on a repeated and prolonged basis, in certain delicate and non-public business things of MGM Resorts … including their attendance at Board meetings,’ scolded the report.

In this dance of mea culpa, MGM CEO James Murren took the position of penitent profligate using the Commission at this week’s hearing, noting that it had been a mistake for the company to allow bad kid Christensen to keep in virtually any capacity with the company.

‘we exercised poor judgment,’ said Murren, who was simply the outfit’s CFO whenever all this transpired. ‘It was an idea that is bad the very beginning. None of us should have had any contact with (Christensen).’

Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.

More Executive Contrition

Murren ended up beingn’t alone to throw himself on the mercy associated with the court, as present MGM board member (and mind of its audit committee) Roland Hernandez made a point to tell commissioners that protocols are now in place within the business to guarantee there will likely be no repeats of this poor process that is decision-making.

All which was then left for the commish to deal with were a couple of concerns they had about some MGM dealings in Macau; mostly, these centered around a former partnership with Chinese business mogul (and child of casino mega-mogul Stanley Ho) Pansy Ho. Ho had been deemed unsuitable as a partner during a 2010 New Jersey hearing that is regulatory the matter, and also as such, MGM had to unload a 50 percent stake in an Atlantic City casino there, just to keep their nose clean. The allegations were that Ho’s father Stanley had had dealings with some Chinese gangs, a definite ‘no-no’ in today’s regulatory video gaming universe.

Hernandez had to the Massachusetts commissioners that Ms. Ho had been involved with MGM completely separate from her father, and that she was primarily involved in non-gaming business tasks regarding their MGM Macau property. Hernandez also noted that other, less finicky, states had been ok with the Ho interaction; particularly, Nevada and Maryland, both of which had no problem along with it. He additionally noted that New Jersey has now softened their stance that is own may allow MGM back in the fold in Atlantic City.

The panel should rule later on this week; the commission’s chair Stephen Crosby won’t state which way the wind is blowing, but noted he appreciated the MGM execs’ openness when controling these issues.

But also being the only applicant and regardless if cleared by the commission this week, it is still perhaps not a 100 percent slam-dunk for MGM Resorts.

‘One applicant or 10, we shall hold their feet to the fire to make certain we have application that is really good’ Crosby advised reporters within a hearing break.

Setback for PokerStars as New Jersey Bars Licensing for 2 Years

PokerStars got a smack from New Jersey regulators this when they put them in licensing limbo for the next two years week

If there’s one name that has dominated the American online poker market over the decade that is last it has to be PokerStars. But if you’re living in New Jersey, you mustn’t expect you’ll be playing on a site operated by the poker giant any right time quickly.

Two Years in Limbo

The New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement made the decision this to suspend the review of PokerStars’ application for an online gambling license for two years, effectively locking the company out of the state’s online poker marketplace for that time period week.

‘The Division of Gaming Enforcement has determined that the application of Rational Services Limited (PokerStars) casino solution industry licensure (CSIE) will be held in a suspended status for a period of two years,’ the Division stated in a declaration.

However, the hinged door is not entirely closed on PokerStars.

‘The Division, within that duration, may think about a demand for relief to reactivate the application if significantly changed circumstances are demonstrated, at which time the Division’s investigation of PokerStars and its particular entities that are affiliated associated individuals are going to be resumed to assess suitability.’

Bad Company, Bad Actor

Although PokerStars has long settled its case aided by the federal government and admitted no wrongdoing as an element of that settlement New Jersey regulators still have some difficulties with the company. Chief those types of appears to be founder Isai Scheinberg to their association, who has been under federal indictment since Black Friday. Scheinberg isn’t U.S. citizen, and have not come to the U.S. to face those charges, to no body’s surprise.

While this is a loss that is huge PokerStars, it also marks an enormous win because of its competitors in the nj-new Jersey market. As we reported recently, the site run by PartyPoker jointly with the Borgata Casino currently possesses 50 percent share of the state’s poker market, with all the Caesars/888 World number of Poker site not far behind. Those two companies could effortlessly have been overshadowed by the PokerStars site which would happen operated in conjunction with Resorts Casino and had been hoping that their head start would give them an advantage that will allow them to stay competitive. Now, they’ll have at least two years to produce brand name commitment, a thing that PokerStars could have a time that is difficult, if so when these are typically finally licensed for brand New Jersey’s online marketplace.

PokerStars ended up being predictably not thrilled by the news, though they noted that the state’s decision could improvement in the near future.

‘We are disappointed that the N.J. Division of Gaming Enforcement has suspended the review of our application at this right time,’ said PokerStars spokesman Eric Hollreiser in a statement. ‘We note that the DGE will resume the overview of our application if our circumstances change. We will remain in open discussion with the DGE and can update them on changes in our situation because they occur.’

This had not been the very first disappointing result for PokerStars in nj-new jersey. Formerly, the company had tried to get the Atlantic Club Casino, only to have that deal break apart over questions about whether regulators would approve the purchase. That choice was also expensive, as PokerStars lost about $11 million they had spent on casino expenses a total that was meant to be applied towards the eventual $15 million cost.

View All Insight Posts