West Virginia Rules DFS Game of Experience; No it’s Maybe Not, Says Delaware

Delaware AG Matthew Denn’s opinion it is DFS is just a not a game of skill. At least, it is not the way we play it!

Western Virginia and Delaware are two states that haven’t any plans to legalize daily fantasy activities in the near future, and for two different reasons. Two attorneys basic, 400 miles apart, have demonstrated two completely different opinions on the legality associated with contests over yesteryear days that are few.

On West Virginia’s AG ruled that there was no need to legalize DFS because it was prominently a game of skill and therefore perfectly legal under West Virginia law monday.

‘We read state legislation to prohibit just betting upon games decided at minimum predominantly by chance,’ published Morrisey in his opinion. But DFS, he said ‘are determined predominantly by skill, knowledge, and athletic performance.’

A matter for the legislature whether West Virginia will now move to regulate and tax the DFS industry, as its neighbor Virginia became the first US state to do at the beginning of the year, is of course.

Delaware Pulls the Plug

In stark contrast, Delaware pulled the plug on DFS last week, with its AG, Matthew Denn, ruling, perhaps more controversially, that the contests had been virtually games of chance.

‘Relying regarding the Delaware Constitution, as well as State and Federal case legislation, DOJ attorneys determined that online fantasy contests that incorporate payment for playing and financial rewards constitute gambling because chance, as opposed to experience, is the dominant factor in the outcome of these contests,’ said Denn.

‘The most participants that are skilled lose much less skilled participants might win because of exactly what actually happens during the real-life game. In other terms, real-life players are human and behavior that is human unpredictable.

‘While its acknowledged that specific individuals may use their sports that are respective in selecting their fantasy players and otherwise participating such contests, that factor alone doesn’t make the contests games of skill.’

Precursor to Regulation?

Denn said that he had written cease and desist letters to DFS sites operating in Delaware, including DraftKings, FanDuel and Yahoo. There has been no formal statement from any operator on the situation, nor any indication of whether they intend to comply.

Of course, the AG’s ruling would not preclude the legislature from passing a law to legalize and regulate DFS as time goes by; certainly, similar rulings from DA’s in other states have proved to be a catalyst for the passing legislation that is such as was the case in Tennessee and Mississippi earlier this year.

A bill to regulate DFS was introduced into the Delaware House at zero hour at the conclusion of the session that is legislative 30 June, but could was far too late be pushed through.

‘We are certain that numerous Delaware residents and visitors would enjoy participating within the full array of fantasy activities competitions, including those who require payment for participation and have cash honors,’ concluded Genn. ‘But until such competitions can be provided legally, the DOJ must enforce the law.’

RAWA Champion Chaffetz Grills AG Lynch, While Sanders Shocks with Clinton Endorsement

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) was back at it on Capitol Hill this week, as the congressman continues to demand answers about the FBI’s recommendation to the Department of Justice (DOJ) not to prosecute Democratic contender that is presidential Clinton.

On July 6, FBI Director James Comey stated Clinton’s use of a private email server while serving as secretary of state was careless, but did not warrant unlawful costs.

US Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) seen here at an earlier hearing using the FBI’s James Comey, grilled AG Loretta Lynch at a House Judiciary Commitee hearing on Tuesday in regards to the legalities surrounding Hillary Clinton’s claims about her email server that is private usage. Lynch largely avoided taking any stance whatsoever, visibly irritating Chaffetz. Representative Elijah Cummings (D- Maryland) sits to Chaffetz’ right. (Image: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)

Chaffetz is Las Vegas Sands Chairman Sheldon Adelson’s right-hand man in Congress. The representative introduced the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) in the homely house to coincide with Sen. Lindsey Graham’s (R-South Carolina) legislation in the Senate.

RAWA seeks to displace the Wire Act to its pre-2011 interpretation. Five years ago, the DOJ issued an opinion saying the Wire Act applied only to online recreations wagering, effectively opening states to legalize Web casinos.

Chaffetz believes the DOJ had no right to unilaterally overhaul federal law. He also doesn’t believe the division is being candid in just how it is responding to Comey’s findings.

Pleading the Fifth

The morning after his agency recommended no charges against Clinton for storing classified emails on non-secure servers, Comey came across with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, of which Chaffetz is the president.

Although he didn’t have the luxury of as much interview time as he did with Comey, Chaffetz did his best to take full advantageous asset of the five minutes he previously with Attorney General Loretta Lynch on Tuesday. As AG, Lynch is theoretically Comey’s boss, since the FBI is just a division associated with DOJ.

But Lynch deflected one concern after another, much to your chagrin of the Utah congressman. The AG avoided giving specific answers to Chaffetz’ ongoing attack of ‘can it be legal or unlawful?’

‘ Is it legal or illegal to talk about classified information with somebody would youn’t have a security clearance?’ the congressman asked Lynch. ‘Is it legal or unlawful to provide access to someone who doesn’t have the prerequisite protection clearance to view classified material? Could it be appropriate or illegal to store, house, or retain classified information in a non-secure location?’

Whenever Lynch regularly and repeatedly referred him to ‘statutes’ to clarify the standing that is legal any of these issues, Chaffetz’ frustration was abundant and unhidden.

‘The shortage of clarity you share with this body is pretty that is stunnin . . My time has expired, If only we had about 20 more minutes,’ he noted.

Sanders Endorses Clinton

Utilizing the email scandal ( at the very least lawfully) behind her, Hillary Clinton has now gotten the nod that is official her former nemesis in Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.

‘Secretary Clinton has won the Democratic nomination,’ Sanders said in New Hampshire, standing alongside the former secretary of state and First Lady. ‘we mean to do everything I could to make certain she could be the next president of the United States.’

Republican nominee Donald Trump countered the announcement by instantly releasing an advertising highlighting the various times Sanders said Clinton was unfit become president.

Bush and Obama Unite, for One Brief Shining Minute

Meanwhile, a moment that is rare of between your political events emerged on July 12 in Dallas. Within a memorial service for the slain police officers ambushed on July 7, President Barack Obama and former President George W. Bush came together so that they can honor those killed with a crazed anti-law, anti-white gunman in a sniper attack

Obama told mourners, ‘As Americans, we can decide that people like this killer will ultimately fail. They shall not drive us apart. We can choose to come together and work out our country reflect the great we share. inside us, the hopes and easy desires’

Before Obama, Bush talked about the selflessness of police officers everywhere.

‘Most of us that is amazing if the moment called we would risk our lives to protect a spouse or a child,’ the former president said for it. ‘Those wearing the uniform assume that risk for the safety of strangers [at all times].’

Further responses about gun control therefore the Black Lives question movement during the service from Obama received criticism from some portions, however, with numerous saying it absolutely was not the place that is right time and energy to address politically loaded issues.

Pennsylvania Online Gambling Bill Shelved Until Legislature Reconvenes This Fall

Billionaire and anti-Internet gambling proponent Sheldon Adelson is likely pleased to master Pennsylvania online gambling will be delayed until at least the fall. (Image: Associated Press/ haaretz.com)

Pennsylvania on line gambling has been pushed apart in Harrisburg until the fall. That is the regrettable outcome for iGambling proponents after lawmakers within the Keystone State labored over gambling expansion legislation for the final several months.

At 12:01 am on July 12, Governor Tom Wolf (D) allowed a bipartisan budget plan to become law without his signature. The $31.5 billion expenditure blueprint will increase spending on education and provide resources to combat the state’s heroin epidemic.

The issue that is primary how exactly to pay it off. Depending on whom’s counting, the appropriations bill produces a $1-2 billion shortfall.

Mostly pushed by Republicans in the General Assembly, gambling expansion has been seen as one perfect untapped resource that may help pay for the master plan. However the legislature is anticipated to adjourn for the summer and not reconvene until sometime this autumn.

Gambling on Hold

Led by State Rep. John Payne (R-District 106), the gambling expansion under consideration could have authorized off-track betting facilities and airports to house slot machines, regulate fantasy that is daily (DFS), and legalize online gambling.

Current land-based casinos would end up being the only ones permitted to supply Internet gambling. Licenses were expected to cost operators $8 million, with gross gaming revenues taxed at 16 per cent.

‘Regulating and taxing gaming that is interactive Pennsylvania is a viable option that will benefit the state and our communities,’ Payne said in belated June. ‘we must consider revolutionary income sources to fill our budget shortfall and keep our public pension system solvent. https://rubetting.club before we ask the taxpayers to fork over more of these hard-earned money,’

Gambling certainly won’t over come the gap that is billion-dollar nonetheless it would help.

Lawmakers estimate $100 million could be generated for Harrisburg in the year that is first largely due to upfront certification fees. Which means five to ten percent of the budget gap could be solved through gambling expansion.

State leaders are also targeting an extra $1 tax on each pack of cigarettes sold, imposing a six percent income tax on digital entertainment downloads, and overhauling the state-run wine industry to allow private merchants to enter the market.

Spend Now, Spend Later

Anyone with credit cards knows essential it really is to cover on time. Unfortunately for residents in Pennsylvania, their leaders that are electedn’t as financially versed.

State Sen. Pat Browne (R-District 16), president of the state’s Senate Appropriations Committee, says action shall be forthcoming.

‘One hundred million dollars into the range of a $31.5 billion budget . . . it isn’t needed right away,’ Browne told the Philadelphia Inquirer. The Lehigh County senator added, however, that the odds of online gambling being reconsidered this fall are ‘probable.’

Wolf was justly upset that the General Assembly don’t send him a way that is calculated spend for the spending plan.

‘The General Assembly has a responsibility that is constitutional pass a sustainable revenue package to pay for what they need to pay,’ Wolf said this week. ‘We owe it to taxpayers, our kids, seniors, and our most vulnerable to bring this across the finish line.’

Quebec ISP Blocking Challenged by Federal Customer Rights Group

Quebec’s plan to block online gambling web site faces a challenge that it’s in direct conflict with federal law. (Image: gamingintelligence.com)

Quebec’s plans to force ISP’s to block access to gambling that is unlicensed being put to the test by a federal consumer rights group. The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) this week filed an objection up to a legislation, passed by the Quebec legislature earlier in the year, which aims to disconnect 8.2 million residents from the unregulated markets.

The bill’s supporters declare that its aim is to ‘improve general public wellness’ by forcing state residents to play on Quebec’s sole regulated online gaming web site, Lotto-Quebec’s Espace-jeux.

But critics, which include net neutrality advocates, technology solicitors, while the ISPs themselves, have accused the Quebec government of establishing a precedent that is dangerous putting commercial gain above the freedom for the internet. The plans, that have been used in the provinces March 2015 budget predict the scheme will boost federal government revenues by $13.5 million in 2016-2017 and $27 million in subsequent years.

Cost to Consumers

These gains will come at the expense that is huge of companies, which have stated that the interruption to their infrastructures will be enormous because they would have to redesign their sites from the ground up. The cost of this would be passed onto consumers.

The PIAC filing states that Quebec is in direct conflict with the1993 Federal Telecommunications Act, which prohibits a communications provider from ‘control[ing] the information or influence[ing] this is or intent behind telecommunications carried unless it has approval from the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission by it for the public.

View All Insight Posts